<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Alix Blog &#187; Windows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alixblog.net/category/windows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alixblog.net</link>
	<description>The Adventures of Chase, Katie, and their dogs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 21:30:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Writing&#8230;.</title>
		<link>http://www.alixblog.net/2009/01/19/writing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alixblog.net/2009/01/19/writing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alixblog.net/?p=95</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, as most of you know, I&#8217;ve been working on my thesis. Well, the background section at least. Currently, including references, it sits at about 30 pages. I feel like that&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve been doing lately. It&#8217;s kind of starting to drive me insane. But I know the sooner I get it done, the sooner [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, as most of you know, I&#8217;ve been working on my thesis. Well, the background section at least. Currently, including references, it sits at about 30 pages. I feel like that&#8217;s all I&#8217;ve been doing lately. It&#8217;s kind of starting to drive me insane. But I know the sooner I get it done, the sooner I can defend it and get out of school (finally!). I also know that this section is the one that is going to suck. It&#8217;ll probably be the longest section, but everything else is explaining what I did (e.g. results) or how I did it (e.g. experimental) or transitory sections (e.g. introduction and specific aims). So I hope that the bulk of my headache will disappear once this section is more polished.</p>
<p>Before I started writing I thought I had a pretty good grasp of what I was talking about when it comes to this receptor. But, the more I read to get the facts precise, the more I realize it&#8217;s so much more complicated than I ever believed. And thus, I get more confused so I have to read more to understand what I don&#8217;t understand.</p>
<p>But on a different note, we managed to get a download of Windows 7. Naturally we didn&#8217;t put it on one of our main rigs, but still one that would get enough to use to find out how well it works &#8212; my laptop. Luckily it&#8217;s not laid out much differently than Vista. It&#8217;s similar to experiencing Office 2007 when you&#8217;re used to Office 2003 in terms of XP to 7. The hiding all open windows features is nice. And with the themes it rotates through a stack of pictures for the background (which for someone who likes to change backgrounds often (i.e. me) it&#8217;s nice). Oh yeah, and the jumplists! /smile</p>
<p>Well I&#8217;ve wasted enough time here, back to re-reading what I&#8217;ve written to expand upon it further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alixblog.net/2009/01/19/writing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vista is (Relatively) Good.</title>
		<link>http://www.alixblog.net/2008/02/20/vista-is-relatively-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alixblog.net/2008/02/20/vista-is-relatively-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alixblog.net/index.php/2008/02/20/vista-is-relatively-good</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I frequent this so-called social news sites (Digg, Reddit, Slashdot, etc), and the amount of FUD and outright lies posted about Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Vista is amazing. These posts seem to clog up the decent and informative Tech articles and it is really starting to annoy me. I would like to take this time to respond [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frequent this so-called social news sites (<a href="http://www.digg.com" title="Digg" target="_blank">Digg</a>, <a href="http://www.reddit.com" title="Reddit" target="_blank">Reddit</a>, <a href="http://www.slashdot.com" title="Slashdot" target="_blank">Slashdot</a>, etc), and the amount of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt" title="FUD">FUD</a> and outright lies posted about Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Vista is amazing.  These posts seem to clog up the decent and informative Tech articles and it is really starting to annoy me.   I would like to take this time to respond to some of the complaints about Vista.</p>
<ol>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>Vista is a resource hog!</strong>&#8220;</font>  &#8212;   This is true when people compare it to Windows XP, but I was taught that an OS should use all available resources.  Why have 2 to 3 gigs of RAM in a machine if the OS is only using a quarter of it.  My desktop has 4 GB of RAM, at idle it uses around 1.5 GB if not more.  This is because of the new technology Microsoft implemented called SuperFetch.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_I/O_technologies#SuperFetch" target="_blank">Superfetch</a> actually learns what programs are being run and when, this helps Vista run faster.  It also uses RAM, but when you launch a memory intensive program, this fetched content is released.<span id="more-11"></span></li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>I have to buy new a new computer or upgrade my hardware to</strong><strong> run Vista.</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; This is only the case if you are running a computer that is 3 or more years old.  My father has a computer that is using 2 to 3 year old hardware and runs Vista with Aero turned on flawlessly.  It has a 3.X Ghz Intel P4 (I don&#8217;t remember the exact number), 2 GB of DDR RAM (Not DDR2), and an nVidia Geforce 6600 GT.  If you computer can&#8217;t run Vista, then stick with XP or buy a new one.  You won&#8217;t be able to run the next version of windows (currently called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7" title="Windows 7" target="_blank">Windows 7</a>) on that machine either.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>Vista is Slow!</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; This relates to the above comment.  Running Vista, or any OS for that matter, on sub-par hardware will cause it to run slow.  Vista will run good with 1 GB of RAM, but 2+ are much better.  If you have sub-par hardware run XP or Linux.  Included in this are those complaining after running it for a day.  It takes a little a few days of use for Superfetch to learn your computer use habits.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>Vista won&#8217;t support my XXXX (some type of out dated peripheral)</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; This is not a fault of Vista or Microsoft.  Microsoft has included a large driver base for support of older hardware, but not for everything.  Manufacturers had access to Vista almost a year prior to its release to the general public, it is their fault for not releasing drivers in a timely manner.  I tend to believe that many of them refuse to support older hardware to force customers into purchasing new hardware.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>UAC is annoying and intrusive&#8221; </strong></font>&#8211; Fair enough, it does get in the way.  I actually have it turned off on my main system.  I used to use the computer with it on, but some stuff is just too frustrating to do with it on.  I am a power user, I need to edit certain files which are protected, UAC stops me from doing this easily.  For the average user, it can be a good tool.  It does not pop up all that often, despite what people try to say (*cough* Apple *cough*).  People used to complain that Windows didn&#8217;t have any security, so Microsoft implements it and now they complain that it is too annoying with it.  A lot of it boils down to idiot programmers having applications access the wrong parts of the system.  A word of advice to programmers:  Use the users folders and registry keys to write to.  I have written an application on Vista that writes to both the registry and the hard drive and not once does UAC pop up.  I do like Ubuntu&#8217;s security model with having to enter in a password though.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>Vista Doesn&#8217;t run XXXX (Insert Program Here)</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; It had to happen sooner or later.  Microsoft had to drop support for legacy applications at some point.  Apple did the same thing a while ago and there was a big uproar about that too.  Update your software or get an emulator to run you old software.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>I am not upgrading to Vista until there is an absolute reason to.</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; This other part of this justification is because the person who said this has older hardware and sees no benefit in Vista.  He has a fair and just reasoning for not upgrading.  There is no appeal to him.  He doesn&#8217;t have a DirectX 10 card and no games that need or require DX10.  Unlike many of the people who have spit out numbers 1 through 6 who have probably never even used Vista.</li>
</ol>
<p>There are many more reasons people give to claim that Vista is a horrible piece of software.  This rabid Apple fan-boys are the main culprits, but they are a whole other post altogether.  I will admit I have had 2 issues with Vista.  The first is that sometimes after updates it gets stuck in a configuring updates loop that I mentioned in a previous post.  This had been remedied in SP1.  The second was actually my fault.  I blue screened Vista when I unplugged the blue tooth dongle while trying to sync the keyboard to it.  That one was more related to a driver issue.</p>
<p>I am not just a Microsoft user though.  I have server that runs Ubuntu and it is extremely stable. My main PC runs Vista Home Premium as does Katie&#8217;s Desktop, our Laptop and the Media Center PC.  I also use Linux, XP, and OSX at work.  I have come to one single conclusion, each OS has it&#8217;s strengths and weaknesses, but boy am I sick of this stupid OSX vs. Linux vs. Windows war.  Unfortunetly most of the FUD about Vista is spread by those who warship Apple or Linux.  Me?  I use whatever OS fits my needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alixblog.net/2008/02/20/vista-is-relatively-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
