Archive for the ‘Rant’ category

How it took us longer to get from the Smithsonian Station to Springfield, VA than it did from Richmond, VA to Springfield, VA

April 5th, 2010

This past Easter holiday, Katie, the dogs, and I went up to her parents house to visit. We left Friday (April 2) after Katie got off of work (I had Friday and Monday off as holidays). A normal trip up there takes around 1 hour and 45 minutes, but Friday it took over 2 and a half hours. It was painfully slow at times on 95 and there was just a ton of traffic. We assumed that would be the worst thing to happen. . .big mistake.

On Saturday, the entire family (Mom & Dad O, the two exchanges students, Katie, and I) headed out to Washington D.C to see all the Cherry Blossoms. We all were in agreement that taking the Metro would be a much better idea then trying to find a place to park in D.C. It was quite busy at the Springfield-Franconia Metro station, but we expected that. We had an uneventful trip to the Smithsonian stop on the Blue Line of about 35 to 40 minutes (Keep in mind, the Blue Line is the only line for the Springfield-Franconia Station). We stayed for a few hours and took a lot of pictures of the Cherry Blossoms (link provided at the end) then we decided to return home. This is where the fun begins.

» Read more: How it took us longer to get from the Smithsonian Station to Springfield, VA than it did from Richmond, VA to Springfield, VA

Refraction

May 19th, 2009

Refraction
Noun
Physics
1. the change in direction of a wave, such as light or sound, in passing from one medium to another in which it has a different velocity

After a few days of pondering life in general, I have gathered a good idea of what is going on and it relates to the word above.  I have never been good at metaphors, but I am at least going to try.

» Read more: Refraction

Reflections

May 17th, 2009

UPDATE:  As was stated in the post after this one (Refraction), this post was taken too personally.  I have updated it a bit to help show that we didn’t mean to offend anyone.

Now that Katie has finished up school and graduated (Yay Katie!), we’ve had a chance to step back and take a look at our life and the direction it is going.  No one is truly ever sure of what their future holds for them, but I think we can influence it by the actions we take and the people we interact with.

Truthfully, if there has ever been a time for me to question the direction on which my life is going and whether I’m at the right place, doing the right things, surrounded by the right people now is it.  Really I shouldn’t just say my life, since I have to have Katie’s best interests in mind too.  We are one now. . .we are the Chatie!  Anyway, this has all stemmed from a particularly nasty email Katie and I found in our inboxes this morning from a “friend.”  The details of this message are going to remain only with the people who it concerns, but it is the main reason for all of our reflections this morning.  This isn’t going to be a rant attempting to chastise this person or anyone else,  I am better than that.

» Read more: Reflections

TV Writers. . .Please for the Love of the FSM do Some Research.

January 27th, 2009

It seems that the writes of recent television shows are just not doing their research before designing some sort of plot.  I just finished watching an episode of one of my favorite television shows, 24 (hours 1:00 PM to 2:00 PM).  I walked away severely disappointed at the lack of reality of the events in the show.

The basic premise is that a "terrorist" has control over the air traffic control system of the entire US (don’t ask, that is another problem completely).  Well this guy doesn’t get what he wants from the government and decides to redirect one aircraft into another and of course KABOOM!  Planes hit each other and a tragedy happens.

Anyway, back on planet earth, this isn’t possible.  I thought it was just common knowledge about the Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) that has been mandated on all passenger jets since 1993.  If we look a little further in to this article we can see where the writers really went wrong.

The Traffic alert and Collision Avoidance System (or TCAS) is an aircraft collision avoidance system designed to reduce the incidence of mid-air collisions between aircraft. It monitors the airspace around an aircraft for other aircraft equipped with a corresponding active transponder, independent of air traffic control, and warns pilots of the presence of other transponder-equipped aircraft which may present a threat of mid-air collision (MAC).

. . .

TCAS II is the second and current generation of instrument warning TCAS, used in the majority of commercial aviation aircraft (see table below). It offers all the benefits of TCAS I, but will also offer the pilot direct, vocalized instructions to avoid danger, known as a "Resolution Advisory" (RA). The suggestive action may be "corrective", suggesting the pilot change vertical speed by announcing, "descend, descend", "climb, climb" or "Adjust Vertical Speed Adjust" (meaning reduce vertical speed). By contrast a "preventive" RA may be issued which simply warns the pilots not to deviate from their present vertical speed, announcing,"monitor vertical speed" or "maintain vertical speed". TCAS II systems coordinate their resolution advisories before issuing commands to the pilots, so that if one aircraft is instructed to descend, the other will typically be told to climb — maximising [sic] the separation between the two aircraft.

So, basically that paragraph is saying that this can’t even happen.  Not only do the aircraft communicate with each other and tell the pilots what to do, it does it without the knowledge of ATC.  Therefore this scenario could almost (I say almost, because there could possibly be a time when the corrective measures work) never happen.

Besides this, let’s not forget the whole idea that everything vital to our government is behind one massive firewall (err. . .what?) that is controlled solely by the NSA (makes little more sense).  Then there is the statement from another show where they want to do a "Reverse IP Lookup" (a what??) by building a GUI Interface (a Graphical User Interface Interface?  Hello Department of Redundancy Department!) using Visual Basic (errrm. . . we won’t every touch that with a ten foot pole).  We then have to ignore the fact that they get an IP address back with something like "312.523.643.12".  This is not even possible in the IPV4 range which can only go up to 255.255.255.255, but even that block is reserved for  broadcast.  Sigh. . .I guess I should give up.

So, I implore all those TV show writers (who will 99.999999999% chance never read this), use Wikipedia to do some research before you release your script to the world.

Writing….

January 19th, 2009

So, as most of you know, I’ve been working on my thesis. Well, the background section at least. Currently, including references, it sits at about 30 pages. I feel like that’s all I’ve been doing lately. It’s kind of starting to drive me insane. But I know the sooner I get it done, the sooner I can defend it and get out of school (finally!). I also know that this section is the one that is going to suck. It’ll probably be the longest section, but everything else is explaining what I did (e.g. results) or how I did it (e.g. experimental) or transitory sections (e.g. introduction and specific aims). So I hope that the bulk of my headache will disappear once this section is more polished.

Before I started writing I thought I had a pretty good grasp of what I was talking about when it comes to this receptor. But, the more I read to get the facts precise, the more I realize it’s so much more complicated than I ever believed. And thus, I get more confused so I have to read more to understand what I don’t understand.

But on a different note, we managed to get a download of Windows 7. Naturally we didn’t put it on one of our main rigs, but still one that would get enough to use to find out how well it works — my laptop. Luckily it’s not laid out much differently than Vista. It’s similar to experiencing Office 2007 when you’re used to Office 2003 in terms of XP to 7. The hiding all open windows features is nice. And with the themes it rotates through a stack of pictures for the background (which for someone who likes to change backgrounds often (i.e. me) it’s nice). Oh yeah, and the jumplists! /smile

Well I’ve wasted enough time here, back to re-reading what I’ve written to expand upon it further.