<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Alix Blog &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alixblog.net/category/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alixblog.net</link>
	<description>The Adventures of Chase, Katie, and their dogs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:32:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vista is (Relatively) Good.</title>
		<link>http://www.alixblog.net/2008/02/20/vista-is-relatively-good/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alixblog.net/2008/02/20/vista-is-relatively-good/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vista]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alixblog.net/index.php/2008/02/20/vista-is-relatively-good</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I frequent this so-called social news sites (Digg, Reddit, Slashdot, etc), and the amount of FUD and outright lies posted about Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Vista is amazing. These posts seem to clog up the decent and informative Tech articles and it is really starting to annoy me. I would like to take this time to respond [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I frequent this so-called social news sites (<a href="http://www.digg.com" title="Digg" target="_blank">Digg</a>, <a href="http://www.reddit.com" title="Reddit" target="_blank">Reddit</a>, <a href="http://www.slashdot.com" title="Slashdot" target="_blank">Slashdot</a>, etc), and the amount of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fear,_uncertainty_and_doubt" title="FUD">FUD</a> and outright lies posted about Microsoft&#8217;s Windows Vista is amazing.  These posts seem to clog up the decent and informative Tech articles and it is really starting to annoy me.   I would like to take this time to respond to some of the complaints about Vista.</p>
<ol>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>Vista is a resource hog!</strong>&#8220;</font>  &#8212;   This is true when people compare it to Windows XP, but I was taught that an OS should use all available resources.  Why have 2 to 3 gigs of RAM in a machine if the OS is only using a quarter of it.  My desktop has 4 GB of RAM, at idle it uses around 1.5 GB if not more.  This is because of the new technology Microsoft implemented called SuperFetch.  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Vista_I/O_technologies#SuperFetch" target="_blank">Superfetch</a> actually learns what programs are being run and when, this helps Vista run faster.  It also uses RAM, but when you launch a memory intensive program, this fetched content is released.<span id="more-11"></span></li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>I have to buy new a new computer or upgrade my hardware to</strong><strong> run Vista.</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; This is only the case if you are running a computer that is 3 or more years old.  My father has a computer that is using 2 to 3 year old hardware and runs Vista with Aero turned on flawlessly.  It has a 3.X Ghz Intel P4 (I don&#8217;t remember the exact number), 2 GB of DDR RAM (Not DDR2), and an nVidia Geforce 6600 GT.  If you computer can&#8217;t run Vista, then stick with XP or buy a new one.  You won&#8217;t be able to run the next version of windows (currently called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7" title="Windows 7" target="_blank">Windows 7</a>) on that machine either.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>Vista is Slow!</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; This relates to the above comment.  Running Vista, or any OS for that matter, on sub-par hardware will cause it to run slow.  Vista will run good with 1 GB of RAM, but 2+ are much better.  If you have sub-par hardware run XP or Linux.  Included in this are those complaining after running it for a day.  It takes a little a few days of use for Superfetch to learn your computer use habits.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>Vista won&#8217;t support my XXXX (some type of out dated peripheral)</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; This is not a fault of Vista or Microsoft.  Microsoft has included a large driver base for support of older hardware, but not for everything.  Manufacturers had access to Vista almost a year prior to its release to the general public, it is their fault for not releasing drivers in a timely manner.  I tend to believe that many of them refuse to support older hardware to force customers into purchasing new hardware.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>UAC is annoying and intrusive&#8221; </strong></font>&#8211; Fair enough, it does get in the way.  I actually have it turned off on my main system.  I used to use the computer with it on, but some stuff is just too frustrating to do with it on.  I am a power user, I need to edit certain files which are protected, UAC stops me from doing this easily.  For the average user, it can be a good tool.  It does not pop up all that often, despite what people try to say (*cough* Apple *cough*).  People used to complain that Windows didn&#8217;t have any security, so Microsoft implements it and now they complain that it is too annoying with it.  A lot of it boils down to idiot programmers having applications access the wrong parts of the system.  A word of advice to programmers:  Use the users folders and registry keys to write to.  I have written an application on Vista that writes to both the registry and the hard drive and not once does UAC pop up.  I do like Ubuntu&#8217;s security model with having to enter in a password though.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>Vista Doesn&#8217;t run XXXX (Insert Program Here)</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; It had to happen sooner or later.  Microsoft had to drop support for legacy applications at some point.  Apple did the same thing a while ago and there was a big uproar about that too.  Update your software or get an emulator to run you old software.</li>
<li><font color="#00ffff">&#8220;<strong>I am not upgrading to Vista until there is an absolute reason to.</strong>&#8220;</font> &#8212; This other part of this justification is because the person who said this has older hardware and sees no benefit in Vista.  He has a fair and just reasoning for not upgrading.  There is no appeal to him.  He doesn&#8217;t have a DirectX 10 card and no games that need or require DX10.  Unlike many of the people who have spit out numbers 1 through 6 who have probably never even used Vista.</li>
</ol>
<p>There are many more reasons people give to claim that Vista is a horrible piece of software.  This rabid Apple fan-boys are the main culprits, but they are a whole other post altogether.  I will admit I have had 2 issues with Vista.  The first is that sometimes after updates it gets stuck in a configuring updates loop that I mentioned in a previous post.  This had been remedied in SP1.  The second was actually my fault.  I blue screened Vista when I unplugged the blue tooth dongle while trying to sync the keyboard to it.  That one was more related to a driver issue.</p>
<p>I am not just a Microsoft user though.  I have server that runs Ubuntu and it is extremely stable. My main PC runs Vista Home Premium as does Katie&#8217;s Desktop, our Laptop and the Media Center PC.  I also use Linux, XP, and OSX at work.  I have come to one single conclusion, each OS has it&#8217;s strengths and weaknesses, but boy am I sick of this stupid OSX vs. Linux vs. Windows war.  Unfortunetly most of the FUD about Vista is spread by those who warship Apple or Linux.  Me?  I use whatever OS fits my needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alixblog.net/2008/02/20/vista-is-relatively-good/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft. . .GRR!</title>
		<link>http://www.alixblog.net/2008/02/13/microsoft-grr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.alixblog.net/2008/02/13/microsoft-grr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 20:08:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chase</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rant]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alixblog.net/index.php/2008/02/13/microsoft-grr</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m sitting here at work, attempting to install another lovely piece of Microsoft software for the 2nd time.  This one is Microsoft Project Portfolio 2007.  Of course this one doesn&#8217;t work the way it should, just like when I tried to install Microsoft Project Server 2007.  That one took, combined with SharePoint Server 2007 (which [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sitting here at work, attempting to install another lovely piece of Microsoft software for the 2nd time.  This one is Microsoft Project Portfolio 2007.  Of course this one doesn&#8217;t work the way it should, just like when I tried to install Microsoft Project Server 2007.  That one took, combined with SharePoint Server 2007 (which didn&#8217;t work and I don&#8217;t think I will need), at least three days.  Sigh. . .not much I can do.  Microsoft has a pretty good lock on this specific part of the market.</p>
<p>Now, don&#8217;t get me wrong.  I don&#8217;t hate Microsoft, but sometimes installing these things makes configuring programs in Linux look like child&#8217;s play.  Soon I will be posting about my pleasant experiences with Windows Vista, despite what has been said elsewhere on the Internet.  Yet, now I have to attempt install number 2 of Portfolio Server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.alixblog.net/2008/02/13/microsoft-grr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
